Placental bleeding

Shalom!  I am a mikvah lady and many women turn to me with questions.  Recently, a pregnant woman asked me to clarify the following situation: She had experienced some uterine bleeding and her doctor told her that it was placental bleeding and therefore she shouldn't be considered niddah (this doctor has many frum patients; I don't know if he himself is observant).  I called a rabbi for her and he said she was niddah and needed to count seven clean days and immerse in the mikveh, which she did.  Now I feel bad that perhaps this rabbi was unfamiliar with the medical reality and perhaps she didn't, in fact, need to consider herself niddah.



Dear questioner,

Thank you for your question.

There is a concept in halakha called "dam makkah", literally blood from an injury, which does not cause niddah status.  Thus, for example, if a woman knows that she has a scratch on the vaginal wall that is bleeding, in most cases she can ignore blood that she sees.  This is even applicable, in the opinion of many authorities, to an injury within the uterus.  If we know that her bleeding comes from a cut, such as from a medical procedure, we can usually ascribe any vaginal bleeding to the injury and she will not become niddah.  HOWEVER, as the rules involved are complicated, and even small variations can have major halachic implications, every situation should be individually addressed with a rabbi or yoetzet.

The doctor in your story probably based himself upon the idea of "dam makkah." However, if the uterine bleeding is caused by natural internal factors such a separation of the placenta and not by a known injury, we would NOT apply the concept of dam makkah.  This is especially true in cases such as this, where we don't have instruments sophisticated enough to determine the exact cause of spontaneous bleeding.  It is for this reason that women (and physicians) should understand the boundaries of the doctor's expertise and the rabbi's.  We fully rely upon physicians for medical information about a given situation.  However, they should refrain from drawing halachic conclusions for their patients based upon medical facts. Women should also be aware of this and should not rely upon their doctors for psak halacha.

This internet service does not preclude, override or replace the psak of any rabbinical authority. It is the responsibility of the questioner to inform us of any previous consultation or ruling. As even slight variation in circumstances may have Halachic consequences, views expressed concerning one case may not be applied to other, seemingly similar cases.

If you have further questions or comments about this email, please click here to Ask the Yoetzet.

The Nishmat Women's Health and Halacha is a public service of Nishmat, The Jeanie Schottenstein Center for Advanced Torah Study for Women. This project and others like it are made possible by contributions from people like you. If you have benefitted from the service, and wish to enable us to help others, click here to donate.


Related Articles

  Vaginal Bleeding during Pregnancy
  Ultrasound for prenatal screening
  Prenatal Testing
  Anticipation of Menses during Pregnancy
  Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villi Sampling
  Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP), Triple, Quad, or Penta Test

Related Questions & Answers

  Onot perishah during pregnancy
  Veset haflagah at four months pregnant
  Spotting during pregnancy
  Bleeding after cerclage
  First prenatal visit
  Cervical bleeding in pregnancy
  Bleeding after relations
  Mikveh in ninth month
  Relations in first trimester
  "Period" while pregnant
  Funerals & cemeteries
  Urinary tract infection
  Announcing pregnancy
  Red on toilet paper
  Customs & superstitions
  Underwear during pregnancy
  Subchorionic bleeding
  Nausea, hunger, and halacha
  Prenatal tests
  GBS Screening
  < More...>

© 2008 Nishmat - The Jerusalem Center for Advanced Torah Study for Women Developed by AlmondWeb